Skip to content
The Insight Journal Business & Operations

The Journal · Contribute

Write for The Insight Journal

We publish original, sourced business and operations writing for people who run companies. Here is what each desk accepts, what gets declined before it reaches an editor, and how paid guest-post placement works.

Reviewed August 2026 · The Insight Journal Editorial Team

Paid guest-post placement Every claim cited

At a glance

  • Six desks open for pitches right now
  • Published under our house byline: no invented author credentials
  • Every non-obvious claim cited to a reputable source
  • Commercial or sponsored pitches are labeled, always
  • Contact for rates: no fixed price list published
Pitch us

The six desks

In short

Pitches are commissioned by desk, not by topic keyword. Each desk page below sets out the ten angles it would commission today, the submissions it declines outright, and the primary sources a draft has to cite. Read the one you are pitching before you write.

These are the same sections that run across The Insight Journal itself, so a contribution lands beside our own reporting on the subject rather than in a separate guest ghetto. All six are open right now.

The quality bar, and how we source

In short

Every guest piece is held to the same bar as our own reporting: original, structured, and sourced. Every non-obvious claim needs a citation to a reputable, linkable source. See our editorial policy for exactly how we choose and attribute sources.

The practical test we apply in editing is simple. Could a skeptical reader check this sentence in under a minute, using the link provided? If not, the sentence changes or goes.

A commercial pitch, meaning one built around a product, client, or paid relationship, runs as labeled sponsored content instead of a guest post. See Advertise with us for that path and its own terms.

What we check before we publish

  • Original: not published elsewhere, not spun from an existing post
  • Minimum ~1,200 words with a clear structure and a real point of view
  • Every non-obvious claim cited to a reputable, linkable source
  • No invented statistics, quotes, case studies, or credentials
  • Plain editorial tone: no keyword stuffing, no hype words
  • Paragraphs of three sentences or fewer, and a heading structure that survives skimming

What gets declined, site-wide

In short

Six categories account for almost every decline we issue. None of them are about writing quality, which is why we publish them: a contributor can rule out a bad idea in a minute instead of losing a day to a draft that was never going to run.

Unsourced statistics

A number with no publisher and no year is removed in editing. If it was load-bearing, the piece does not run.

Product pieces dressed as editorial

If the real subject is your product, it belongs on the sponsored path with a label, not in the editorial feed.

Recycled listicles

Tips that would fit any company in any industry contain no decision, and our readers already have that article.

Invented authority

No fabricated case studies, credentials, quotes, or client results. We publish under a house byline precisely to remove that temptation.

Regulated advice

Investment, tax filing, legal, and medical instruction are declined regardless of framing or disclaimer.

Link-first submissions

A draft written around a link rather than a reader is visible immediately, and it is the most common single reason for a decline.

Which desk is yours

Pitches sent to the wrong desk are usually redirected rather than declined, but the wait is longer. This table is the fastest way to place an idea correctly.

Every desk publishes its own decline list and accepted sources on its own page.
The six Insight Journal desks, their scope, and the reader each one is written for
BusinessGrowth tactics, strategy frameworks, and the failure modes of scaling too fast.Founders and owner-operators of companies under roughly 200 people
MarketingB2B and digital marketing strategy with a plan behind it, not channel cheerleading.Marketing leads at B2B companies under roughly 200 people
SaaSNeutral, function-first software guidance. No thinly veiled vendor pitches.Operations and IT leads choosing tools for a small team
FinanceSMB-grade cash flow and operations finance, not investment advice.Owners of companies where cash timing decides the month
LeadershipPractical management skill-building, not motivational filler.First-time managers and the people who promoted them
Supply ChainProcess, logistics, and resilience, grounded in how operations actually run.Planners, buyers, and warehouse managers

How to pitch, in four steps

  1. 1

    Pick the desk

    Six desks, each with its own scope, decline list, and accepted sources. Read the one that fits before you write anything.

  2. 2

    Send a short pitch

    Two or three lines: topic, angle, and the sources you plan to cite. A draft or outline helps but is not required.

  3. 3

    We reply with scope and rate

    If it fits, we confirm placement, link treatment, turnaround, and cost before you finalize the piece.

  4. 4

    Draft, edit, publish

    We edit for structure, clarity, and sourcing. Expect at least one revision request if a claim is not cited.

The full submission standard, including formatting, citation style, and what we do with images, is set out in the guest post guidelines.

What makes a pitch land

In short

The pitches that get commissioned name three things in three lines: the decision the reader faces, the position the piece will take on it, and the primary sources that will carry the claims. Everything else, including the outline, can wait until we have said yes.

A pitch we would commission

Supply chain desk. Piece on why dual sourcing is usually mispriced at small volumes, arguing that qualification cost, not unit price, decides whether a second source pays.

Sources: ASCM SCOR reference for the sourcing process, BLS producer price data for the cost base, and a worked qualification cost example.

Three lines, one clear position, and a sourcing plan we can check. That is enough to get a scope and a rate back the same week.

A pitch we would decline

Hi, I would like to contribute a 1,500-word article on supply chain trends for 2027, covering visibility, automation, and sustainability, with one link to our platform.

Three subjects, no position, no sources, and a link doing the structural work. This is the most common shape of submission we receive and the most common decline.

The fix is rarely more words. It is picking one of the three subjects and saying something about it that a reader could disagree with.

Why everything runs under a house byline

In short

Every piece on the Journal is published as The Insight Journal Editorial Team, contributors included. We take editorial responsibility for each published claim, and a house byline is the honest way to say so. It also removes any incentive to invent credentials.

No invented experts

Many sites manufacture author personas with fictional consulting histories. We do not publish an author bio at all, so there is nothing to fabricate.

The sources carry the authority

Credibility comes from what a claim is cited to, not from a title next to a photograph. That is why the sourcing bar is the strictest rule we have.

What you get instead

A maintained page with a reviewed date, contextual links that serve the reader, and an editor who will correct the record in public if we get something wrong.

If a byline is the point of the placement for you, this is not the right publication, and we would rather say that here than after an invoice. The published editorial standard sets out the rest of our position, including how corrections are handled.

Pitch a guest post

Tell us your desk, topic, angle, and sourcing plan. If it fits, we will follow up with next steps and rates.

Replies within 2 business days

Questions

Writing for us: common questions

What topics do you accept?
Original business and operations writing across six desks: business strategy and growth, marketing and sales, SaaS and business technology, finance and cash flow, leadership and management, and supply chain and operations. Each desk page lists the angles it will commission and the ones it declines.
How long does it take to get published?
It depends on the editorial queue and how much revision your draft needs, so we confirm a timeline when we reply to your pitch rather than advertising one we might miss. Drafts that arrive already sourced move fastest, because the fact-check pass is usually what adds time.
Are the links in a guest post dofollow?
Links in a genuine editorial contribution are followed where they are relevant and useful to the reader. Any link placed as part of a paid or sponsored arrangement carries the sponsored attribute, because that is what Google link-spam guidelines require. We will tell you which applies before you write, and we do not sell followed links.
How much does a guest post cost?
Pricing depends on scope, placement, and turnaround. Contact us for current rates. We do not publish a fixed price list.
Do you edit submissions?
Yes. Every piece is edited for structure, clarity, and sourcing before it runs, and we may ask for revisions if a claim is not cited.
Will my name appear on the article?
No. Everything on the Journal runs under our house byline, The Insight Journal Editorial Team, because we take editorial responsibility for every published claim. That policy applies to staff and contributors equally.
Can I submit a finished draft instead of a pitch?
You can, and we will read it. A pitch first is usually faster for both sides, because it surfaces a scope or sourcing problem before you have written 1,500 words around it.
Do you accept content written with AI assistance?
Assistance is not the issue; unverified output is. Every claim has to be one you checked against a primary source yourself, and drafts that read as assembled from other articles are declined.